There are third party references to the repeated destructions of Jerusalem and who truly ruled the area. Problem is people taking the Bible literally and then trying to see what fits and rejecting the rest of the evidence, the Bible was not written as a historical book, it was not intended as a chronicle or a textbook. The Bible as we know it is a rather small selection of available books about Jewish religious/moral teachings from its beginning as a polytheistic religion to the start of Christianity and its trinity. It’s been refined and edited over the ~500-1000 years that it took to be composed.
If you want to take the Bible literary and prophetic you have a lot of explaining to do from the first to the last verse. One date in one supposed prophecy is the least of your problems. You’ll have to explain all the mythical characters from Adam to David, you’ll have to explain the roughly 50 year time shift of Jesus’ character to the time he was according to modern tradition born & active vs the recorded dates on the mentioned rulers as recorded by the Romans, both the missing and added names from the various Biblical geneology records etc.
Even before the Romans, Jerusalem had been destroyed or captured and recaptured dozens of times. The Romans themselves did it at least three times before Christianity starts, yet the Bible somehow ‘forgets’ all those events and pretends there is a singular line of inheritance to the regional throne. Very convenient if you’re at the end of that genealogy at the time said genealogy is written.